Showing posts with label Elijah Dukes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elijah Dukes. Show all posts

Fantasy Elijah Dukes: Aaron Harang

For those of you new to GOI, there's a running gag here that a fantasy player who I claim is Elijah Dukes is essentially just my fantasy sleeper. True, in recent years, players who I have deemed to be my Elijah Dukes have not panned out. But it's probably fitting considering the year I claimed Elijah Dukes as my sleeper was the same year I paid 20 bucks for Baseball Prospectus which happened to coincide with BP's worst year ever for predicting fantasy players. But I digress.

Every year, for both fantasy football and fantasy baseball, I like to tout one player who you can get for a dollar in your auction draft, last round in your snake draft, or even better a player you can get in free agency. I've come to deem my Elijah Dukes player as stretch guys anyways so it's probably no surprise they tend to not work out. These are not guys who I think will be good, but flier guys who I think you should get if you have the roster room for them.

For the 2011 fantasy baseball season (and as the title obviously suggests) my Elijah Dukes is Aaron Harang.

If Harang doesn't work out, then Oh Well. You didn't pay that much to get him so it really was no skin off of your back. And if Harang does play well I'll be more than happy to play the reverse side of the coin and say it was a lucky call. I won't be, pardon my French, a little bitch and not take the blame if Harang doesn't pan out but turn around and call it my greatest call ever if he does.

The reason I like Harang is two-fold: The first (and main reason) is that Harang is now playing in the friendliest pitchers park in PETCO (San Diego) and the second is that he's not playing for Dusty Baker anymore.

Let me address my second point first: Aaron Harang is not playing for Dusty Baker anymore. Although I am not a Chicago Cubs fan, I saw first hand how Dusty destroys pitchers. Kerry Wood has revamped his career as a reliever (especially here in Chicago) but you still can't utter the words "Kerry Wood" or "Mark Prior" in the Chicagoland area without Cubs fans cringing knowing what potential Baker destroyed in these two promising kids.

I remember my sophomore year in college sitting around in my R.A.'s dorm room while DME and I were discussing baseball. The year was 2007 and Dusty Baker had just recently been hired by the Cincinnati Reds. Harang had just come off of a season where he went 16-11 with a 3.76 ERA, 1.27 WHIP, and a 8.3 K/9. DME was raving about Harang for the upcoming season while he was mock drafting and not paying attention to the conversation in the room and every five minutes our R.A. would yell at DME to shut up about fantasy baseball. I retorted back to DME that while I loved Harang's promise I would be staying away from Harang (and all Reds pitchers) because of the Dusty Baker signing. DME responded that Harang was a workhorse and Dusty wouldn't affect him and that Harang would be good for the upcoming season.

Well, DME was half right.

Harang was amazing in the upcoming season where he was 4th in NL Cy Young voting with a 16-6 record, 3.73 ERA, 1.14 WHIP, 8.5 K/9 all in 231.2 innings pitched. The reason I say DME was half right was because Dusty Baker did ruin Harang, but I was one year too early getting off the Aaron Harang bandwagon.

Over the next four seasons, Harang's innings pitched dropped from 231.2 in '07 to 184.1, 162.1, and 111.2 respectively. Harang's ERA ballooned over the same time frame from 3.73 to 4.78 to 4.21 to a career low last year with 5.32. Harang's WHIP also blew up going from 1.14 in 2007 to 1.38, 1.41, and 1.59 respectively the past few seasons. Needless to say Harang's HR/9 grew, his K/9 dropped as well as his K/BB ratio.

Now certainly there are a myriad of factors that could contribute to those poor numbers. But I blame Dusty Baker. Whether you think that opinion is rational or not is up to you, but not only does Dusty Baker have a history of ruining pitchers, I've seen Dusty force Harang into throwing too many pitches on too little days rest.

In fact, when I did a Google search of "Aaron Harang Dusty Baker" not only did I find instances where Baker threw Harang out after a rain delay and after Harang admitted to having dead arm, but I found an article written last year by DME entitled "Aldrois Chapman, Meet Dusty Baker" where DME analyzed Reds pitchers by their Pitcher Abuse Points and you can see how high Harang ranks among PAP. In fact, in that very same article, DME links to another article where he claims Dusty Baker broke Harang on May 22, 2008. DME writes:
As an owner of Harang last year, Baker's impact was extremely frustrating. As fangraphs notes, Baker used Harang pretty heavily early on, but he held together pretty well. That is until May, however, when Baker found a very creative way to break him. After having thrown 103 pitches through 5.1 innings on May 22, Baker called upon Harang to throw another 63 across four innings just three days later. Four days after that, Baker started Harang on four days rest, allowing him to throw 73 more pitches across four more innings of work.
Part of the reason that I am not all in on Harang is because it is entirely possible Dusty broke Harang for good. Kerry Wood came back but he had to do it as a reliever. Shoulda-beens Mark Prior and Jason Schmidt never came back. The most recent pitcher Dusty broke was Edison Volquez who is still on-and-off with injuries (Although admittedly I think Volquez' injuries would have happened with any manager). However, Harang is only 32. It's a tad old for my liking but certainly within the range of a comeback year. Call it a gut feeling, but I like Harang pitching outside the control of Dusty Baker.

The main reason I like Harang though is because he's pitching in PETCO park.

I would love to do an analysis (DME-style) where I tell you what Harang's WHIP, K/9 and ERA will be when factoring in Padres defense and park factors and such; however, I neither have the intellectual capacity to do such an in-depth analysis nor set constants to do such research.

For starters, I don't know where to begin with Harang. Ideally, one would use some baseline numbers before factoring in defense and park, but I don't know what Harang's are. I would like to use his 2006 and 2007 season numbers but I'm also an idealist. I truly don't know if Dusty full out broke Harang or Harang will revert back to form with new scenery. For the sake of my own personal fantasy team I'm taking the latter, but I just don't know. Secondly, the additions of Brad Hawpe, Orlando Hudson, and Jason Bartlett makes predicting San Diego's team UZR and USR/150 just a flat out guess. Thirdly, maybe someone can help me with this, but I just don't know how to translate PETCO's park effects to a pitcher's fantasy numbers.

But I will give you evidence (outside of your common knowledge about PETCO) to show just how good the park can have on fantasy pitchers. While there will always be a spot in my heart for Jon Garland (and a spot in my closet because I own a #20 shirt) as a White Sox fan, he truly is not a good pitcher. Garland has a career ERA of 4.32, 4.76 K/9, and a FIP of 4.47. Despite that, Garland, while calling San Diego home last year, had an ERA of 3.47 and a 6.12 K/9 with 14 wins.

I see no reason (if Harang is fully healthy and we use Harang's 2005-2007 average ERA) that Harang can't post a 3.4-3.5 ERA with a 8+ K/9 if he pitches for an entire season in a Padres uniform. Even if Harang performs like Clayton Richard did in 2010, we're still looking at 2007 Harang numbers.

Hopefully, in my long winded rant, I have convinced you to take a flier on Harang, or at the very least, if you have a guy go on the DL that you pick up Harang to fill a roster spot. At the minimum I hope you draft Harang in an NL-only league. If I have convinced you of that then I will have considered my job done a successful one.

Fred Taylor = Elijah Dukes

No Fred Taylor doesn't send his wife texts threatening to kill her or get fined for being late to practices while helping out America's youth, dawg. Just read on.

This year in our fantasy baseball draft, I touted Elijah Dukes as the huge sleeper for this year's baseball season, dawg. Now I based this mainly off of Baseball Prospectus' numbers (they also told me Ian Kinsler would have a high average, Garrett Atkins was worth my 5th round pick and be like a healthy A-Ram but with a better average, and Matt Wieters would actually make contact with the ball). Obviously I wasted my money on this shitty service and should have just done research myself (If you looked at Dukes' numbers in a small sample size, it made sense why BP and Matthew Berry touted him as a sleeper, but his past numbers looks pretty good in waivers now...whatever) Anyway, now it is colloquially known at GOI: Who is your Elijah Dukes this year? Obviously this is meant to be a sleeper that DOESN'T bust, but now that I have actually done research for myself, I can say my opinion with confidence this year. For fantasy football, my Elijah Dukes is: Fred Taylor

Taylor has a career 4.6 YPC. This ranks 8th out of all active RBs. Guys ahead of him: AP, Michael Turner, MJD, Brandon Jacobs, DeAngelo Williams, and Frank Gore. All are first or high second round draft picks. Out of all active RBs, Taylor has the 6th best yards per game and is 16th of all time. Taylor also gets plenty of attempts ranking 20th all time in rushing attempts.

Taylor is now bringing his great gifts to the highly talented Patriots offensive line. The Patriots had the third best rushing O-line last year and THE best line two years prior. Every RB the Patriots threw out there was effective- the problem was injuries/ lack of carries. The main Pats back to get significant carries was Sammy Morris and he was top 10 in DVOA and DYAR. I can also verify his fantasy impact because him and Pierre Thomas helped win me my fantasy football league last year. Kevin Faulk and Lamont Jordan played a significant amount last year, but not enough to qualify their numbers with the big boys. But out of guys between 20-99 rushes, Faulk ranked first and Jordan ranked 5th. So no matter who runs for the Patriots, they seem to be effective.

Now I will admit, I think Taylor is your #2 RB or your flex guy at best. I don't think he's a top tier back, but I do think he'll finish in the top 25 among backs (thus, your #2 guy). I can say with confidence that when Taylor plays, he will be great in real life, but sadly (and yes I realize this is a fantasy column) I am worried about how he performs fantasy wise. The realist in me says the Pats, with a healthy Brady, will throw more (and not to Taylor) and Maroney and Faulk will take carries away from him. But Maroney has never played more than 14 games in a season (13 and 3 consequtively the past two years) and Taylor is by far better than Faulk. However, in '06, when Maroney only played in 13 games and Brady threw for 50 TDs, he still was the 25th best fantasy back. And when MJD was taking TDs and carried away from Taylor, Taylor still was a top 20 RB. The cynic in me tells me that Taylor won't get enough carries or TDs to be productive in fantasy, but by looking at his past numbers, I find it hard to believe that a guy who has proven to be as good as Taylor on a team THAT good doesn't produce. And frankly I'll take the risk that Taylor gets the carries.

The most important thing to look at is where you can get Taylor. I got Taylor in the 13th round of a 15 round draft (and if I hadn't gotten him I'm not convinced he even would have been drafted). I'm not sure what his ADP is, but in Yahoo! leagues, he's ranked 56- out of all RBs! If you can get a guy who will be top 60 among all RBs and WRs (meaning worth at least the flex position) or even a guy who will be top 25 among all running backs (meaning worth a starting RB spot), why would you not take him!? Even if Taylor does performs like he did last year, who cares!? Chances are you're not going to start (or even keep) any player you drafted past the 12th round anyway (unless your smart and you drafted your sole K and DEF), so he's absolutely worth the risk.

Maybe I'm making excuses for Taylor because if I'm wrong like I was with Elijah Dukes, I gave myself an out, dawg. But there is absolutely no excuse why you don't draft/ pick up now in FA Fred Taylor.

The Tumultuous Tale Of Elijah Dukes

Inspired by my earlier post, I decided to dig a little into past of Darryl Strawberry Elijah Dukes and found tales so bizarre, they are downright hilarious. Unbeknown to me, Elijah Dukes and his "Dawg" talk have secretly become an internet meme among baseball bloggers.
On top of this, the following information about Elijah Dukes' off field life is available on Wikipedia:
  • In 1996, Dukes' father was convicted of second-degree murder. One year later, Dukes was arrested for the first time. Dukes has been arrested at least three times for battery, and once for assault. According to court records, he fathered at least five children with four women between 2003 and 2006.
  • On May 23, 2007, it was reported that his wife filed a restraining order after he threatened to kill her. On June 12, a 17-year-old foster child who was living in the care of a relative of Dukes accused him of impregnating her. Police said the sex was apparently consensual. When the girl confronted Dukes, he allegedly got angry and threw a bottle of Gatorade at her.
  • Dukes has received anger management training. When Dukes was traded to the Nationals, the team also hired an ex-police officer in the role of "Special Assistant: Player Concerns". This person accompanies Dukes everywhere to ensure that he keeps himself free of trouble.

Bizarro Baseball

When some people want to learn how to not suck at batting, they take lessons from a guy who walks 90+ times a season and has 60 home run power (albeit with steroids). Lastings Milledge, however, is getting batting advice/approval from none other than Corey Patterson.

Aggressive Milledge Seeking Lost Form
From August 1 until the end of last season, Milledge hit .318/.378/.485 with 7 homers and 11 steals in only 52 games by swinging less at bad pitches.

SYRACUSE, N.Y. -- Corey Patterson took his place behind the batting cage, nodding in approval as Lastings Milledge took his cuts.
For your consideration, Corey Patterson is a lifetime .253/.291/.407 hitter. He has only once (in his injury-shortened 2003 season) slugged above .450. He has only once walked more than 23 times in a season. Only once hit more than 16 home runs in a season. Only thrice hit over 19 doubles in a season. Only once batted above .276 (again, the injury-shortened 2003 season) and only twice batted above .269. His career wOBA is .305.

Who now, who I asks, gives a shit if Corey Patterson gives approval of another's approach at the plate? That's like saying L. Ron Hubbard approves of another person's made up religion.

An impending storm forced the players to the indoor cages before a recent rainout here at Alliance Bank Stadium, where playing baseball in April is typically a risky proposition. Five other members of the Syracuse Chiefs lingered, waiting their turn, knowing the extra work would not come in handy on this night.

But the veteran outfielder Patterson intently watched Milledge, the talented 24-year-old abruptly demoted to Class AAA by the Washington Nationals after one week and 24 at-bats. Milledge, the team's Opening Day center fielder and leadoff batter. Milledge, one of the young foundations on a franchise dying for any sort of progress.

Milledge wanted more time. "It was just one week," he said.

With Adam Dunn, a healthy/productive Austin Kearns and Elijah Dukes in the outfield mix, Lastings Milledge never really belonged as the starting CF in the first place. Where Milledge had a -5.1 UZR/150 in CF this season (-20.1 UZR/150 last season), was walking 4.0% (6.8% last season) of the time and had zero XBHs (.134 ISO last season), Dukes has been worth +2.7 fielding runs (+44.3 UZR/150 last season) in +300 innings of outfield play, walking at a 9.4% clip (15.3 BB% last year, 14.5% career) and has already racked up 3 homers with a .208 ISO (.213 ISO last season). Elijah Dukes is, in every possible capacity, better than Lastings Milledge.

Now, nearly three weeks into his minor league assignment, Milledge proclaims his swing is back. He quickly ditched the patient approach Washington wanted from him. He is here, the unlikeliest of places as the second month of the baseball season commences, free-swinging with a sour taste in his mouth.
Hitting for average is not the by product of impatient hacking, but rather that of good pitch recognition, hitting line drives and having good speed.
"I can see it through his actions that he has a plan now and it's coming out," said Patterson, a nine-year major league player. "Where before, like the first one or two days, I didn't see that."

The best and only nice thing that the Wall Street Journal can say about Corey Patterson is that he is "a nine-year major league player."

The Nationals had justification for the demotion. Milledge hit .167 in his seven games at the top of the order. He struck out 10 times against one walk. Washington's leading home run and run producer in 2008 had mustered zero homers and one RBI. Also, he struggled in center field.

Technically, the team's leading runs producers, in terms of wOBA, was Elijah Dukes -- who, in under 300 ABs, had 13 home runs. In fact, the following players (min 150 PA) all were better at runs creation than Lastings Milledge (.325 wOBA, below league average) last season: Elijah Dukes (.382 wOBA), Nick Johnson (.374 wOBA), Ronnie Belliard (.369 wOBA), Ryan Langerhans (.353 wOBA), Dmitri Young (.352 wOBA), Cristian Guzman (.341 wOBA), Willie Harris (.340 wOBA), Ryan Zimmerman (.336 wOBA).

To his credit however, Lastings Milledge's trying to kill your wife per nine (TKW/9) is much lower than Elijah Dukes, dawg.

It still doesn't sit well with Milledge, who wears a blue T-shirt and red shorts emblazoned with Nationals logos. He says he has lost faith in the organization's coaching staff.

Baseball gave up on more than just the National's coaching staff loooooong ago.

"From now on, I'm going to do what I feel like I have to do to be the best for the team, regardless of what other people say," Milledge said. "When it's all said and done, I know myself better than anyone else."

Just watch this:

The transition to leadoff for an aggressive hitter such as Milledge was underestimated, he said. The Nationals wanted a different approach at the plate from a player who has struggled through his first two major league seasons to stay consistent.

If I ran a baseball team, I'd want a different approach from a guy who hit .267/.326/.400 in just over 1000 career PA too.

That is why, for now, the experiment is on hold.
Actually, the .299/.365/.506 and +2.7 fielding runs above average put up by Elijah Dukes this season is the reason the experiment is on hold, dawg.

Since joining the Chiefs on April 17, Milledge has yet to bat first. Instead, he has batted second 10 times and third four times. Through 14 games in Syracuse, Milledge is hitting .263, with a .333 slugging percentage, four doubles and three RBI. He still hasn't homered.

"I don't think he's a leadoff hitter," Syracuse Manager Tim Foli said.

A .326 OBP has not screamed "bat me first" since Joe Torre realized that playing Juan Pierre on the bench was more valuable to the team than playing him in the #1 hole.

Foli said Milledge's primary task while at Class AAA is to build a routine that will breed that consistency. For Milledge, that means returning to what he knows best.

Did you watch the youtube video I just posted?

Milledge is a free swinger, not the usual mold of a leadoff batter. He said Nationals officials wanted him to see 12 to 15 pitches per game, which meant taking more pitches than usual. Here, there are no guidelines.

This sentence sounds like a monologue from the baseball remake of Logan's Run.

Nationals acting general manager Mike Rizzo was noncommittal on Milledge's future role with the team. He echoed Foli's sentiments, saying the priority is for Milledge to play as much as possible -- without regard for where he is hitting in the lineup. Rizzo would offer no timetable for Milledge's stay in the minors.

"He's got to get as many at-bats as he can down there," Rizzo said. "Not necessarily in the leadoff position or in the No. 3 position."

Rizzo said he is pleased with the reports he has received about Milledge's demeanor; unprompted, Foli said that Milledge's attitude has been "great."

There have been no less than three references in this article, thus far, that have indicated that Milledge's attitude is the opposite of great. He hates the coaches, refuses to listen to their advice and is doing his own thing. "I know myself better than anyone else" -- how is that a great attitude for a guy who just got demoted and is in need of a different plate approach?

Milledge remains somewhat positive. The demotion means he is out of options and Milledge said it is a chance to play in front of other teams that could be interested in him down the line.

I smell a rule 5. Plenty of teams like to give ABs to a guy whose career ISO matches Neifi Perez's career high season in isolated power (.140 in 2000, when he was playing in Coors Field).

"Maybe somebody will remember how I played down here," he said. "I don't like to say I'm being punished right now."

Lastings Milledge is hitting .263/.300/.333 in AAA. Enough said.

As he sits outside the dimly lit indoor batting cage, Milledge smacks his black bat against the AstroTurf. He notices a white scuff mark, licks his finger and wipes it off. He pretends to swing a few times and looks down.

"Let your bat do the talking," he says. "It's the only thing you can do."

David Eckstein-like words of gritty, grindy wisdom! The world is a cruel, twisted place, where Corey Patterson gives major league players batting advice and 2 plus 2 makes 5.