Is Edinson Volquez For Real?

Following up on my post earlier this morning, I thought I would take a look at another young pitchers who had a breakout year in 2008 and ask if we could expect sustained success in 2009.

In a deal that landed Josh Hamilton in Arlington, Edinson Volquez was traded to the Reds prior to the 2008 season. Volquez, a powerful strikeout king in the minor leagues (never below 9.5 K/9 at A, AA or AAA), had just made an abbreviated (34 IP) stint with the Rangers in 2007, where he posted a 4.5 ERA (4.56 FIP) and solid 7.68 K/9 with questionable control (1.93 K/BB). Overall, Volquez, between A, AA, AAA and the majors in 2007, logged 178.2 IP at age 24 (45 IP increase from 2006). In 2008, he had a breakthrough season, posting a 3.2 ERA (3.6 FIP) to match improved strikeout numbers (9.46 K/9) and control (2.22 K/BB). While Volquez took baby steps backwards in the BB department, his increased strikeouts and decreased HR/9 rate (due to an increased usage of off-speed and breaking pitches -- 10% decrease in fastballs, 6% decrease in FB and 8% increase in GB) more than compensated.

While many speculate that Volquez, who posted a 2.1 ERA through the first three months, was getting lucky and point to his 4.37 ERA after the break, a lot of Volquez's true luck -- which was actually negative luck -- came in the final three months, when he posted a 3.95 FIP. During his first few months of baseball, Volquez put up great peripherals that lent to a 2.95 FIP -- surely higher than his 2.1 ERA, but still great numbers none the less.

Volquez struck out 45+ batters in two separate months in 2008 and kept his walk rate pretty consistent and in line with the league average all season long. Volquez's strikeout "decline" (from >9 K/9 to 8 K/9) in the middle months may have been the result of fatigue during his first major league season, but he ended the year strong, punching out 45 guys in 33 frames.

All and all, you gotta say Volquez earned much of his reverance as one of the game's toughest pitchers in 2008. His numbers are largely in line with his career averages. The glaring exceptions are his BB rate -- which most projection systems predict to fall a little -- and HR/9 rate, which one would have to expect to regress a bit in the homerun friendly Great American Ballpark. All five projection systems on fangraphs expect Volquez to pretty much repeat his numbers from 2008, albeit with a slight regression in the ERA/FIP department, for 2009.

So Volquez is probably for real, but we gotta ask ourselves another question before simply drafting him: is Volquez primed for injury? Statistics aside, Volquez plays for a man who single-handedly broke the two greatest pitchers not named Greg Maddux to ever come out of the Chicago North farm system. Baker is notorious for abusing pitchers -- especially young pitchers. This should scare guys like Homer Bailey, Johnny Cueto and Edinson Volquez.

Last year, Baker was handed one of the NL's most durable pitchers in Aaron Harang. Harang had pitched 210+ innings in each of the last 3 seasons and over 230 each of the last two. Over the course of this time, his numbers remained both dominant and consistent, with a K/BB well above 3 and a BB rate that never eclipsed 2.2 per nine innings. As an owner of Harang last year, Baker's impact was extremely frustrating. As fangraphs notes, Baker used Harang pretty heavily early on, but he held together pretty well. That is until May, however, when Baker found a very creative way to break him. After having thrown 103 pitches through 5.1 innings on May 22, Baker called upon Harang to throw another 63 across four innings just three days later. Four days after that, Baker started Harang on four days rest, allowing him to throw 73 more pitches across four more innings of work. Prior to the May 22 start, Harang had a 3.5 ERA and the following peripherals:


In his eight starts following the late May fiasco, Harang's numbers tanked, as his ERA exploded to 7.31. As fangraph notes, Harang's peripherals regressed to the following line:


Harang eventually ended up on the DL and came back to pitch 2.83 ERA baseball over his last eight starts, but his K/9 fell even further to 6.00 and his BABIP was a lucky .258. A winter's worth of rest should do Harang a lot of good, but knowing the effect of Baker on a guy like Harang sends chills down my spine when I look over Baseball Prospectus' Pitcher Abuse Point rankings for 2008 and notice that Volquez actually accumulated more PAP points than did Harang last season.

Thankfully, this news isn't as bad as it seems. Harang never eclipsed a 120 pitch count -- the danger zone threshold for abuse -- and Volquez only did it once (almost twice) in 2008 (by contrast, Mark Prior pitched 120+ pitches nine times in 2003, often in a consecutive starts). Furthermore, Volquez was "only" the 17th most "abused" arm in all of baseball, falling well below other guys like Tim Lincecum, CC Sabathia, Johan Santana, Ryan Dempster and even fellow Red Bronson Arroyo. Additionally, Volquez -- at age 25 -- only increased his seasonal workload by a reasonable 27.1 innings in 2008, thereby avoiding the ominous "Verducci effect" threshold (I really like that word, don't I?).

So what is my conclusion? Considering that Volquez's performance last year was largely "for real" and that he wasn't nearly as abused as many people (like me) may have superficially believed before delving into the numbers, I would say that Volquez may be one of the more underrated value arms for 2009. Volquez has an ADP of 104, which makes him available with the likes of Rich Harden, Carlos Zambrano and AJ Burnett. Given his strong K rate, sub-4 ERA upside and relatively less abused arm/better health history, Volquez is probably the best pick of the bunch.

Japanese Imperialism

We all agree the WBC is meaningless, right? I guess Ichiro didn't get the memo. Here's his take on Japan's 1-0 loss to South Korea,
"I am angry at the fact that we lost," he said. "It would have been great if we had crushed them."

Is John Danks For Real?

Kenny Williams seems to have developed a knack at acquiring young guys with great potential that other teams have given up on (Jenks, Quentin). If it weren't for his sexual affinity for being sodomized by Billy Beane and signing old people to long contracts, the Sox would have a quality young team in the works. However, you have to wonder how much of some player's production is luck and how much is talent.

In particular, let's look at '08 Sox ace John Danks. Is John Danks a true-phenom like Carlos Quentin, who posted +.225 ISOs at every level except with the D-backs in 2007 due to an early season labrum injury, or a lucky guy like Gavin Floyd, the flyball pitcher at the cell who posted a 3.84 ERA and 4.77 FIP?

John Danks took a huge step forward in 2008. After posting FIPs of 3.94, 4.67 and 5.54 between AA, AAA and his first major league season (respectively), Danks posted a 3.44 FIP in 195 IP. His 3.32 ERA, 3.00 BABIP and 2.8 K/BB seem to indicate that the season wasn't luck. However, despite Dank's earned success in 2008, there are some looming question for 2009.

First and foremost, is Danks' HR/9 rate, which had never been below 1.4 at any level prior to last season, where he posted a .7 HR/9. In the offense friendly Cell, you have to wonder how much of Danks' HR/9 improvement from 2008 can translate over to 2009. Do we expect him to continue at a rate 1/2 his career norms or do we expect some regression? The law of averages (and logic) says to me that even if Danks doesn't entirely revert back to his 1.4 HR/9 days (let's say Danks' success in the HR dept had to do with a GB% that rose by 8% due to the introduction of a Cutter and less use of a fastball, which would continue in 2009) that some regression towards the mean is still in order. If John Danks were to exactly repeat his numbers from 2008 in 2009, but have a 1.0 HR/9 rate, his FIP would rise to 4.05. Thus, we should expect some regression in the ERA (and WHIP, maybe even Ws) department in 2009, even if Danks' improvements are for real.

We make this 2009 FIP increase with the assumption that all else from 2008 remains constant. How much of it should we expect to remain constant, however? Let's say the K/9 and BB/9 are for real. Danks has always posted good control (>2), so this is reasonable assumption. However, my concern is in the injury (and thus IP) department. John Danks, soon to be 24, pitched 55 innings (not including the playoffs) above his previous season total (139) and 55 more innings than his career high (140 IP, 2006). As Baseball Prospectus has shown, pitchers are most brittle before the age of 24 and after the age of 35. Tom Verducci observed that pitchers under the age of 25 who increase their seasonal workload by more than 25-30 innings in a single season are the most susceptible to injury the following year.

From a fantasy prospective, all signs point to John Danks being overvalued in 2009. Between the low HR/9 rate at the cell and the potential for injury, Danks is just not worth the risk. Much of his upside was reached in 2008 and it's not worth paying a premium for his services when you expect some regression and looming health concerns. If Danks comes your way, I'd pass (or at the very most aggressively package him in a lucrative trade before the season starts). With an ADP of 157, you're better off with Max Scherzer (higher upside, similar innings potential if you factor in injury concern), Erik Bedard (you might as well pick the better K/ERA guy with injury problems) or Kevin Slowey (stay away from him Sexy Rexy, he's mine). Hell, why not just wait a few rounds and grab the extremely comparable (similar FIP, similar control, similar HR rate), but less injury prone, Gil Meche (ADP 207)?

And that's my professional opinion as a fantasy baseball player, not a Cubs fan.

The Great Runs Expectancy Chart

Here is a chart of the mathematical run expectancy (based on tons of data from 1999 through 2002) with various runners on or not on various bases with various amounts of outs. Cool shit, right? It sort of proves that sac bunting a guy over from any base decreases run expectancy. Take that, Dusty Baker!

Fantasy Baseball Resources, take 2

As live drafting/auction season switches into high gear soon, I thought I would be generous and throw this link of ADP's and AAV's your way to help you better value players based on large samples of real time mock drafting/auctioning data (rather than by the arbitrary rankings ESPN and Yahoo gives you).

Quick WBC Notes

-The Netherlands beat the Dominican Republic! Twice! This mean that the Netherlands advance to the next round and the DR does not! The DR with Big Papi, Edison Volquez, Pedro, Robinson Cano was defeated by Sidney Ponson and.... um... 24 other guys I've never heard of (OK, 23 guys, Ponson, and Rick VandenHurk)! The DR lost! They have 23 major league players and they lost! Think about crazy that is!
-But as Cubs fan, you guys should happy DR lost because Carlos Marmol now does not have to put extra strain on his arm
-At first I was upset that MLB players were in the WBC. Then I realized the WBC could be very advantageous to hitters but still pretty detrimental to pitchers. Then I realized there was only 3 starters per team. And then I realized that really only half of the teams in the WBC HAVE major competitive pitchers and then a good chunk of those teams get eliminated in the first round, so not a whole lot of major MLB pitchers really pitch a lot. Although still, Jake Peavy and Roy Oswalt are gonna get hurt in '09. Probably.
-Also, no White Sox pitchers are in the WBC so I'm happy and this probably biases my last point
-I don't care about the WBC still yet I'm really rooting for the US to win it all. I think if the U.S. wins it all, it will legitimize the Classic. Plus with the Olympics canceling baseball, this only helps the WBC. But as for right now, I just don't care.

Applying Statistics to Actors

In a recent ESPN.com post, Bill Simmons talks about statistics in relating to the best actors and actresses of all time. Since, as our mission statement says, "Statistics are our science and 'the immeasurable character of men' is the obsolete religion of blind faith" and since we love movies as well, I figure this article would be an interesting, light-hearted read. Here's an excerpt:

If the Oscars were reliable, they would help us create a formula that enabled us to rank actors of all eras. Well, what if we tried anyway? Let's make best actor/actress nods worth seven points and nominations worth three. Then let's make best supporting actor/actress nods worth three and nominations worth one. It's a highly scientific formula I just spent at least 27 seconds devising. And guess what? The Simmons Cinematic System shakes out in an overwhelmingly logical way.

VODM: VALUE OVER DERMOT MULRONEY, NOT VALUE OVER REPLACEMENT PLAYER.

Top 13 actors: Nicholson (38); Spencer Tracy (35); Laurence Olivier (32); Marlon Brando (30); Hoffman, Newman (29); Jack Lemmon (28); Peter O'Toole (24); Gary Cooper, Hanks, Penn (23); De Niro and Pacino (22).

Top 10 actresses: Hepburn (52); Streep (45); Bette Davis (41); Ingrid Bergman (29); Jane Fonda (27); Greer Garson (25); Liz Taylor (23); Jessica Lange, Sissy Spacek (22); Ellen Burstyn (20).

Other moderns of note: Daniel Day-Lewis, Foster and Kate Winslet (18); Robert Duvall (16); Russell Crowe, (13); Sly Stallone (3); Keanu Reeves (0).

Are you happy with those rankings? Me too! I'm a genius! Yeah, Pacino and De Niro should be higher, but they were robbed in '74 and '76, so their stats make sense. Lemmon's number surprises me a little. Same for Fonda. Other than that, I have no major qualms besides a failure to account for iconic performances like De Niro's in Raging Bull (should it be worth 10?), Nicholson's in The Shining (he wasn't even nominated!) and Keanu's in Point Break ("I am an EFF BEE EYE AGENT!").

Now, if you feel like getting your supernerd on, you could figure out Simmons Points on a per-film basis by dividing SPs by movies made (Streep has a sterling 1.13 average), a Hollinger-like AER (actor's efficiency rating, some combination of awards and box office gross that would invariably crown Harrison Ford the greatest ever and drive me crazy) or even VODM (like baseball's value over replacement player, only it would be value over Dermot Mulroney). Just make sure you run all of your calculations through me, because I just bought the URL www.hollywoodprospectus.com.


You can read the whole column here

Matthew Berry Is Consistent

For all you fans out there who have read "Fantasyland"- mainly MVP Ecketein, here's something I thought was funny when reading Matthew Berry's post "Love It/ Hate It" for the 2009 season. Under "Hate It":

Big Fat Bartolo Colon, P, White Sox: Because I am a slave to tradition.


I thought that was pretty funny. He's a funny and knowledge guy too. Some of his reasoning is pretty stupid but it's mainly for entertainment value and if you asked him I'm sure he'd give you a better one. You can read his column here

30 Teams In 30 Days Is Dumb

I'm sick of this. This isn't people's opinion's anymore. This has become a forum for trivial banter and I'm sick of it and I'm not doing it anymore. Players we predict will do well won't, players we thought suck will do well, teams will surprise us, and teams will disappoint us. That's just the nature of things. Did anyone predict the Rays to go to the World Series or the White Sox to win their division? Did anyone predict Tim Lincecum will win the Cy Young or that Erik Bedard will suck cock for a season? Probably not. The nature of prediction can allow for the thrill of exceeding expectations but mainly allows for the brutal reality of not living up to potential. There's no reason to predict, we're going to be wrong.

As much as analysts and economists, and statisticians would like to play and think they can play an entire season of baseball with no players and just numbers- they can't. There's an human element that can and will never be quantified.

I'm done with predicting and I'm done with "30 Teams in 30 Days" shit. This isn't fun anymore and it just leads to frustration and annoyance. If anyone wants to take over my "predictions"- feel free

Oh, and in case nobody does, here's my Kansas City Royals prediction: They fucking suck, they're a bad team, and they're going to finish last. Draft Zach Grienke, Mike Aviles, and Joakim Soria.

Chicago Cubs roster preview

This is how I see the Cubs roster shaping up.

Position players
1.Geovany Soto- Catcher
2.Derek Lee- First basemen
3.Mike Fontenot- Second base and utility guy
4.Ryan Theriot- Shortstop
5.Aramis Ramirez- Third basemen
6.Alfonso Soriano- Left fielder
7.Kosuke Fukudome-Center fielder and fourth outfielder
8.Milton Bradley- Right fielder
9.Backup catcher: Paul Bako or Koyie Hill
10.Aaron Miles- Second base and utility infielder
11.Micah Hoffpauir- Pinch hitter, backup outfielder, and backup first basemen.
12.Reed Johnson- Platoon centerfielder with Fukudome and 4th outfielder.
13.Joey Gathright or long shot of So Taguchi- 5th outfielder

Rotation
14.Carlos Zambrano
15.Ryan Dempster
16.Ted Lilly
17.Rich Harden
18.Sean Marshall

Bullpen
19.Carlos Marmol
20.Kevin Gregg
21.Chad Gaudin
22.Luis Vizcaino
23.Aaron Heilman
24.Lefty: Neal Cotts or Mike Stanton
25.Jeff Samardzija, Chad Fox, Kevin Hart, Jose Ascanio, David Patton, Ken Kadokura, and Angel Guzman.

The Detroit Tigers

Last year showed everyone that you need some sort of pitching to have any chance at winning games. Now I have absolutely no logic or reasoning for why Verlander did as bad as he did so my prediction is that he'll be somewhat competent and do some of what he did in previous years. Jeremy Bonderman just now sucks and I think it's wishful thinking to think any better. Now the 3-4-5 guys in the rotation are interesting. They added Tampa Bay former 5-starter Edwin Jackson, but he had an ERA over 4 so I don't see why anything should change. Zach Miner, the current 5 starter is a former bullpen arm and quite honestly I haven't seen anything from him either to show he deserved to get out of the bullpen. But their #2 starter intrigues me. His name is Armando Galarraga and he had great numbers last year. Like really really good ones. So If Galarraga (who's only 26) pitches like he did or better than last year and Verlander reverts back to form this pitching gets a huge boost and like an extra 10 wins added to my fake projection of them, but again, that's an IF. I actually don't see it happening though. Maybe tomorrow I'll be able to throw a 100 mph fastball too. Actually if I did I'd probably have a guaranteed spot in the Tigers bullpen, because I too would have no accuracy. This bullpen has been pretty bad for some time but a strong rotation and Todd Jones has sort of hid that, but last years shitty ass rotation but the bullpen's shittiness to the forefront. Adding Brandon Lyon is SOME improvement but they now don't have Todd Jones, the only good player that could find the strike zone in that bullpen. Now the Tigers offense is another story. Miguel Cabrera, Magglio, Placido Polanco, Curtis Granderson, Gerald Laird, Carlos Guillen, and Gary Sheffield are some damn fine players (and Brandon Inge at third and Adam Everett at short may be shitty offensively but they bring some much needed defensive help to that infield) but I just don't see them being good enough to score more runs that their pitching staff gives up, because that pitching staff is going to give up a shit ton.

Projected position in division: 3rd

Players to draft:

-Miguel Cabrera: Ended up being #1 in AL HRs last year. Just make sure he has 3B capabilities otherwise he loses value and drops out of the first round

-Magglio Ordonez: He doesn't hit a lot of HRs for an outfielder but will probably have a batting average over .300 with a about 17 HR and some RBIs and Rs. Finding anyone with a BA over .300 is very difficult and one that will help you in three more categories will be very beneficial

-Placido Polanco: He might also have a BA over .300 and his value increases because he plays second base

-Curtis Granderson: He's not really a guy who excels at one particular category but he can do all five (well BA is iffy but…) pretty decently which garners a place as maybe your #2 or #3 OF

-Carlos Guillen: See Jeter, Derek under the Yankees. He's nothing too impressive but there will be a huge drop off in talent if you don't have a SS and some one just drafted Guillen, you need to find a sleeper and fast!

-Brandon Lyon: He's not the best or consistent closer but he'll rack up the saves. A damn fine #2 closer for your team .

Players I personally don't trust:

-Justin Verlander and Armando Galarraga: Both have shown in the past they can be very good and draft-worthy pitchers but I just don't see it for next year

Derek Jeter's half whiteness is better than your full whiteness

So the WBC has proven to be a highly skilled competition with unexpectedly good showings from Korea, the Netherlands, and even the US, but the broadcasting has been god awful. Rick Sutcliffe sounds like he's permanently drunk, with all the love and nostalgia he's been uttering the past week. I'm going to try to recap some of the bullshit i have heared recently.

1) On a sac fly by brian mccann, sutcliff honestly believed that the reason mccann went the other way to avoid a potential double play was because he had taken batting practice with derek jeter. See brian mccann knows nothing about the game of baseball, it's not like he's a 2 time all star or has a career 122 OPS+ as a catcher. He magically learned how to play the 'right way' by watching derek jeter perfect the opposite field flyout. Magic!

2) Today, sutcliffe brought up bobby abreu's reputation as a les a faire player. you know, boring stuff like running the count, walking, stealing bases at 80%, scoring and driving in 100 runs. boring stuff like that. He then reminded us all of the great derek jeter and when he went face first into a second row chair. No one remembers hideki matsui going face first into a comiskey seat. stucliffe then went on to name some random guys who he considers grindy grinders who play baseball the right way. The list included jeter, youkilis, pedroia, chipper jones.

Hence, my conclusion that only white guys are allowed to be grinders. Jeter's mom is white, and the mitochondria is only passed on by the mom, believe me, so jeter's motor is white. To recap, latin players are lazy bitches. White guys grind and win championships. Fuck Ryan Howard

3) Sutcliffe's partner, dave o'brien, brought up the JP Ricchiardi situation from last year when he basically called Adam Dunn a lazy fuck who didnt try and doesnt like baseball. He apparently hits 40 homers a year out of spite for the game. Instead of mentioning these little details, o'brien said the controversy between dunn and JP was mainly due dunn's strike out totals. Who is o'brien trying to protect by leaving out the part where Ricchiardi dissed dunn's entire career. He's obviously protecting ESPN and the WBC. Good thing he didnt bring up baseballs steroid era, cause he probably would have called it the flinstone vitamin era to save face.

4) Sutcliffe, in his drunked state, decided to entertain himself by rattling off wierd and unusual baseball injuries, something we love here at GOI. The only problem is that he got them all wrong. Most notably, he tried to remember why Joel Zumaya had to miss most of the past 2 seasons. Sutcliffe thought it was because he was carrying meat of some sort. No that would be Clint Barmes. Zumaya got hurt by excessively playing Guitar Hero till his forearm muscle died.

I know i'm supposed to be eternally grateful for sutcliffe's 16-1 record and cy young he won for the cubs in 1984, but it's not worth a lifetime of brain dead baseball announcing

The AL East

Now that I've run through the AL East teams, it's time to reveal who will end up where in the standings. Before the A-Rod injury, I postulated that the AL East standings would look like this:

1. Tampa Bay Rays
2. Boston Red Sox
3. New York Yankees
4. Baltimore Orioles
5. Toronto Blue Jays

With Alex Rodriguez out of the mix, all short of an act of god has solidified my belief. Some, like Baseball Tonight's Steve Phillips,are pointing to a useless stat that indicates that in each of the past six seasons, the Yankees have had a losing record through at least the first month of baseball and all but once (2008) ended up in the playoffs. This isn't a skill, however, but random coincidence. The more you lose, the deeper you dig yourself into a hole. Just because you were able to dig yourself out before, does not mean you will again (forever) in the future. It reminds me of the logic of Israel's Likud political party according to Thomas Freidman, in which he says Israeli's conservative leaders in the 1980's become detached from reality under the illusion that because Israel was able to defeat its enemies through some combination of strategy and miracle in 1967 that they would be able to surely do it again.

Anywho, I digress. The logic behind these rankings is simple. Toronto has the biggest issues to overcome this season. Shaun Marcum is out for the year due to Tommy John surgery. Dustin McGowan dealing with shoulder problems. Overpaid OF Vernon Wells has a seemingly endless list of nagging health concerns that currently includes a hamstring injury. AJ Burnett, who is often injured, but nonetheless talented, is gone. Fantasyland joke Rod Barajas was the team leader in home runs for half of 2008. Alex Rios regressed from a 25+ HR player to his 162-game average production of 15 HR. Furthermore, the Blue Jays slugged under .400 as a team (no player except Vernon Wells (20 HR) had more than 15 HR in 2008). So while Halladay should be a continuously dominant force in 2009, there is not much to be excited about for the Jays this year outside of Halladay, BJ Ryan and OF prospect Travis Snyder.

Baltimore, as I've already detailed, has some nice young players, but almost all of them are very raw and have not yet "developed" into major league players.

The Yankees underperformed last year due to injuries, but the returning players are only a year older this year, while the new ones, in my opinion, merely replaced the production of the players who parted ways with the Bronx Bombers during the offseason. Coupled with the A-Rod injury, the Yankees will have a hard time staying in the Wild Card race.

The Red Sox had an undeniably great team last year and added some nice pieces to the offseason that will help them down the stretch (ie, Smoltz), but the Rays, who were better than the Red Sox last year, are better primed to repeat with equally good off-season acquitions to match a young core of players that are either entering their prime or in the middle of the sweet years. The battle for the top will be tough, but I give the edge to the Rays who can expect a bounceback from players like Crawford and Upton, while the Red Sox will need to deal with regressions from Jon Lester and Youkilis.

Cleveland Indians

I don't know the exact stat but the Indians were actually one of if not the best baseball team in the second half of the 2008 season. Too bad for the Indians season are 162 and 81 games long. This team has definitely had a great off-season adding underrating 2B and jack of all trades Mark DeRosa and a closer that doesn't blow games in Kerry Wood. Now for the part two years Wood has been good in the bullpen but he's oft injured and old so we'll see how he holds up. I think he'll do just fine but of course have some weeks where he's injured. Overall, he (and you and me probably) are still better than Joe Blow. The Indians are actually a perfect example of how bullpens can change from year to year. In 2007 they had one of the best. Last year, they fell apart. I've seen this bullpen pitch and they do have proven guys so I find it hard that this bullpen can't recover. The Indians also have one of the best and young pitchers in the game right now in Cliff Lee. The only problem is that I don't trust the other four guys behind Lee. According to ESPN.com it is Fausto Carmona, Jeremy Sowers, Carl Pavano (really!?), and Anthony Reyes. Don't even worry about the last three, but Fausto has shown that he could be good. But last year he just walked WAY too many batters, and too high of a WHIP and had such a low ERA that he was bound to blow up sometime. And he probably would have if he hadn't gotten injured. If he can stay healthy and be 2007 dominant, then maybe the Indians can win this division. But then again, if ESPN read this post and I became their new anchor my life would be pretty awesome. IF. The pitching is too suspect for me to declare any post season hopes for Indians but an offense with Victor Martinez, Grady Sizemore, Mark DeRosa, and Shin Soo-Choo (look him up, he ended the year very well. I know I had him on my fantasy team) is bound to help you win games. And fuck Travis Hafner, BTW. I read an ESPN article saying Hafner will help this offense. Yeah and maybe Bonds didn't do steroids. Garko is fine and I guess for the bottom of an order who could do worse than what the Indians have. An offense and Cliff Lee helped this team win 81 games last year. If the bullpen improves then this team can win more, but as good of an off season that the Indians had, I don't think they did enough to win the division again. This team seems opposite of the Twins, good offense and mediocre pitching (actually, I think this rotation sucks but…) and I'll take pitching over hitting any day of the week.

Projection position in division: 2nd

Players to draft:

-Cliff Lee: Don't expect 2008 numbers at all but still a great pitcher

-Grady Sizemore: I'm not going to waste my breath, if you have a late first round pick, take him

-Victor Martinez: A top tier catcher that will get RBI, R, and HR

-Mark DeRosa: One of the most valuable back ups because he can essentially play all positions and is always undervalues every single year. He'll put up good numbers

-Kerry Wood: He's worth taking as you're second closer only because of the injury risk. Don't take him as your #1 closer

Players to avoid:

-Fausto Carmona: He's going to suck next year and will blow up in your face if you draft him

-Travis Hafner: His projected stat line from BP: .248 avg/ 13 HR/ 52 RBI/ 1 SB/ 48 R. Do you really want this player? He's only projected to get 10 more R than HR!

The Minnesota Twins

You wanna know how to win games in the regular season and post season. Well actually there's no set formula and you can win it a variety of ways… but the one we hear about all the time is pitching and defense. And Minnesota sure as hell has that. It's almost a good thing the Twins really didn't do make any major trades this offseason because their now second year GM, Bill Smith, hasn't had a good track record. Right now, all he should do is let the valuable farm system the old GM, Terry Ryan, created bear its fruits and in about 5-10 years when that dies, then start getting new players. However, the major signing they do make was a good one- former White Sox 3B Joe Crede. He's an improvement over the shit the Twins had before at third. Unlike the recent Twins 3Bs, Crede can actually be productive offensively because he has power and is perfect in the 6 hole of the lineup. The main focal point of this team this year will be the rotation. You may not have heard of these good young rotation (probably because you're not obsessed with fantasy baseball as the four of us are), but trust me, they're good. Their rotation will most likely consist of: Fransisco Liriano, Kevin Slowey, Scott Baker and Nick Blackburn, with either Boof Bonser or Glen Perkins in that fifth slot. The four main starters are guys with great control who may not strike you out but they sure as hell won't walk you, and that's what's really important (except for Lirino who WILL strike you out). I personally think Boof Bonser kind of sucks and would be best suited as a long term guy in the bullpen or even better traded to another team but that's besides the point. The Twins bullpen is still pretty good with a great closer in Joe Nathan and a damn fine set up man (when healthy) in Pat Neshek. Bullpens are tricky because they usually are good one year and then shitty the next, but then again, Ryan stocked the team and farm system with such great talent that the Twins is one of the only teams to have a consistent bullpen year after year. The only offense this team really has is Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau, and Denard Span but that's OK because all the players on this team can play defense (and are only good FOR defense) and with the defense, great pitching and a just-good-enough-offense-to-create-SOME-runs triad of hitters, the Twins should win this division.

Projected position in division: 1st

Fantasy players to draft:

-Fransisco Liriano: He ended the 2008 season strong and there's no reason he can't and won't revert back to his 2006 form

-Kevin Slowey: Had phenomenal control which only can produce great things for a pitcher. He won't have the highest strikeout but his control will help him rack up W, WHIP, and ERA. Plus if K/BB is a category in your league, he'll be great

-Joe Mauer: He is one of the best catchers in the game right now. He can hit above .300, walk, and generate R and RBI

-Justin Morneau: He's no Albert Pujols but he'll get you a shit ton of RBIs (100+) and will hit about 25 home runs

-Joe Nathan: Do I really need to explain this one?

The Chicago White Sox

Why hasn't Kenny Williams read Moneyball!? At least Joe Morgan READ IT. Yes, he may have dismissed everything it stood for and thus making him a huge hypocrite because what's talked about in Moneyball is what makes Joe Morgan one of the greatest 2B if not baseball players of all time… but I digress. Williams needs to learn that getting on base and not homeruns creates a great offense. This offense doesn't have that. I'm glad the White Sox got rid of all the players that they did but the problem was the didn't get any huge improvements in return, at least not those that will pay off in 2009. They let go of Javy Vazquez (good, if he didn't strike you out he gave up a HR), Joe Crede (a 3B with great power but didn't walk and had a back problem in which he didn't fix after the '05 season like the team asked him to), and Nick Swisher (I don't care how good your plate discipline, you can't have an OBS THAT low like Swisher did. You still need to make SOME contact. He really was pissing off the team) To replace Crede, the Sox signed this Cuban guy Dayan Viciedo who supposed to be amazing but he's only 19. They also have Josh Fields who regressed heavily from his potential ROY season two years ago. Neither option is too hopeful. To replace Swisher the team is starting again Brian Anderson. Again, like J.D., Alexei Rameriz, a guy who can hit HRs but can't walk. On the upside, he's a phenomenal defender. I mean one of the best. The offense still had Carlos Quentin, Jim Thome (I don't care his age. He could be 70 and still have the ability to walk and hit 20-30 HRs), and Paul Konerko. And if you doubt Paulie let me put something into perspective. Jermaine Dye was top ten, maybe top five in OBS and OPS in the AL at the All-Star break. By the end of the year Paulie had a better OBS than J.D. (yes Dye stopped walking and hitting HRs but give Konerko some credit from bouncing out of slump and ending the year great). A.J.'s also one of the better offensive catchers so I have no complaints about him. To round out the offense we have 2B Chris Getz (Rameriz will play SS). Who last year had a BA of .286 and an OBS on .286. Yeah, so Kenny should fucking read Moneyball so his offense will improve! Now after all that this team could still beat my expectations if this teams pitching improves. Because of bullpen inconsistencies and my natural cynicism (plus the way this bullpen performed in the second half, now granted I think a lot had to do with Linebrink's injury so if he can stay healthy…) I think it will be hard for Bobby [Jenks] to save games when the bullpen blows leads. Now the rotation is solid with Buerhle, Danks, and Floyd but I also think the rotation has too many questions to be considered good enough to go better than 82-80. The stud of this rotation will be John Danks. However, just how disappointing that fact is, let me just give you a taste of what Baseball Prospectus is predicting out of Danks in '09: 10 W/ 4.27 ERA, 1.34 WHIP/ 137 SO, and this guy is your ace! Floyd is predicted to regress, Mark Buerhle is consistently inconsistent, Clayton Richard is too young and hasn't shown enough that he can pitch well and consistent and free agent Bartolo Colon, while actually pitched decent last year, will be too injured to have any real impact. Now Kenny has shown me he knows pitchers so I won't be surprised in this rotation and bullpen exceeds my expectations and the ChiSox are in another division hunt (hell, they did last year), but right now Cleveland and Minnesota look too good for me to place my beloved Sox any higher. On the plus side, Detroit and Kansas City look really really bad; bad enough for me to think the White Sox won't be last or second to last in the division. On the bright side, I do think the Sox have much better depth because of trades and whatnot but as some coach (I think NFL) once said, and I'm paraphrasing here "Depth is only good until you need to use it".

Projected position in division:
4th

Players to draft
:
-Carlos Quentin: This man would have been the AL MVP had he not been injured in the last month. The guy walks and had power and being in the number three hole will help him generate RBIs and Rs. Hell, last year he had AJ Pierzynski and Orlando Cabrera hitting ahead of him and he still had great RBI and R totals
-Bobby Jenks: He's a great arm in the bullpen that will get all the chances he wants to generate saves. Just be careful of his lack of ability to strike out guys and draft accordingly
-A.J. Pierzynski: Outside the top teir catchers (like Martin, Martinez, and Mauer, etc), there's guys like AJ. He doesn't put up great numbers as a baseball player, but as a catcher they're very valuable. It's not a bad strategy at all to wait until a lower round to snatch up AJ so you can get the guys you really want. And outside the top tier catchers and the god awful shitty guys, there's guys like AJ. He'll generate a lot more runs than he's used to if he continues to bat in the 2 hole
-Alexei Rameriz. I wouldn't expect another .300+ BA from him but like all White Sox, he hits HRs. This will be extremely valuable if you can play him at 2B. In fact, both SS and 2B are not that deep and while Alexei is not a top tier guy, after he goes, the drop off will be huge between him and the next best player

Guys worth the risk in the later rounds
-Jim Thome: It hurts him that he's only useful in the Util spot but he still walks and is projected to get 24 HRs
-Paul Konerko: He shows signs at the end of the year that 2008 is not indicative of what's to come. Again, another guy who walks and will get 20+ HRs
-Jermaine Dye: (notice a trend here is the type of player). He'll get around 25 HRs and is a good #4 option in your outfield

Players to avoid
:
All White Sox pitchers outside of Bobby Jenks

The Toronto Blue Jays

Looks like I'm substitute blogging for Eckstein today. Finally!

The Toronto Blue Jays play in the AL East, which basically tells you everything you need to know about their playoff chances this season. I know Eckstein predicts them to finish dead last in the division, but I'm gonna give our Canadian friends some love and predict they finish in their customary 4th place. The lineup is extremely bland this year, and most every year for that matter. Amazingly, they only had one player, Vernon Well, with an OPS above .800 last year, and were being led in home runs by Matt Stairs for most of the season. They have not made many changes to their everyday lineup, which desperately needed some offensive pop, maybe even Adam Dunn. Instead of free agents, the Blue Jays are counting on young top prospects, Travis Snyder and Adam Lind, to spark the Jays' meager offense. Snyder is said to have 35+ homer power and Lind the ability to hit .320 in the big leagues, but neither has shown star potential the likes of Longoria, Braun, and even Chris Davis. They got rid of the real David Eckstein; however, Marco Scurato is basically his Venezuelan brother from a different mother. I don't see their 126 homers, .331 OBP and .399 slugging improving too much next season. It is a young ball club, but the only real upside I see is Alex Rios.

The bright spot of the Blue Jays Organization has been their pitcher development, or at least in was until every single one of them went down with arm problems. Halladay is a strike out/ground ball beast who is as a sure thing as any other pitcher in the bigs. He was able to accumulate 20 wins last year, despite having Stairs and Thomas leading the offense behind him. However, this may be the year Halladay is finally traded at the deadline as the Jays' aren't likely to contend any time soon. Last year was the break out year for 3 stud starters in Jesse Litsch, Dustin McGowen, and Shaun Marcum. All have above average control of the strike zone, and the potential for 200 strike out seasons. But as is the case with many young pitcher these days, McGowan and Marcum have succumb to serious injuries that puts their futures in jeopardy.

Not only is the starting rotation a strong suit, but the bullpen will also help the Jays separate themselves from the Orioles. BJ Ryan is currently having trouble with his mechanics, which can be a real problem, just ask Dontrelle Willis, but he has been a topo closer when healthy. Still, the strength of the bullpen is in the setup men. From the left side, Scott Downs has had a tremendous career since crying after being traded to the Expos from the Cubs. Righties Carleson, League, and Tallet all feature solid peripherals with below 3 era's from last year. It is the pitching depth that will keep the Blue Jays from the abyss of the AL East.

My biggest gripe with the Organization is their Gm JP Ricciardi. He was one of Billy Beane's cronies in book "Moneyball", but wasn't really one of the stat freaks that worked under Beane. Everyone thought it was a great addition for the Jays, and some still do, but I have always been critical of this dope. His on field acquisitions have been laughable to say the least. His first mistake was letting Carlos Delgado walk and signing Vernon Wells to a hundred million zillion dollars. Seriously? If you're from my generation and too young to remember the Robby Alomar, Joe Carter, John Olerud Blue Jays, Delagado is the Jays. Since leaving due to "age concerns" Delgado has proceeded to smack 33, 38, 24, 38 homers for the Marlins and Mets with 3 top 12 MVP votes. Wells had one good season, batting in front of Delgado, prior to the league realizing he can only pull the ball. He makes Soriano's contract look like one of Jim Bowden's 'steals'. Ricciardi also game closer B.J. Ryan a 4yr/$44 million dollar contract. He is a top closer, but don't you think so much money can go to better use? Last year, he decided to retool his infield by acquiring David Eckstein and trading Troy Glaus for Scott Rolen. No need to dissect the Ecktein move. He finished first in grindiness and last in every other statistical category. It was obvious to everyone that Scott Rolen no longer has a right shoulder, but Ricciardi was convinced Rolen's shoulderless toughness was more valuable than Glaus's 30 homer bat. He also acts extremely snotty with the media, despite never winning anything, also disputing any suggestion or rumor from the media. He called Frank Thomas a dog, Adam Dunn a dog, and anyone who's not him a dogg. I hope he gets fired soon, i really do.

Players to Draft:
Roy Halladay- Low WHIP, low era, high wins, high innings, high K/BB, low FIB, career 131 ERA+. What else do you want you greedy bastard?

Jesse Litsch- Not a standout name, but an above average selection in the later rounds. He has the K/BB to overcome less than overpowering 'stuff'

B.J. Ryan- I'm not big on drafting closers high, but if you must this guy is a stud when healthy. Like I said, there have been reports that his delivery is off, but that may just be an excuse to not play in the WBC.

Alex Rios- He is a 5 tool outfielder, although no bonus points for the arm in fantasy. I believe he will regain the power stroke he showed in 2007 as he overcomes the shoulder injury. I see 70 xbh, 30 steals, and 90+ runs and RBI's. Definitely the best position player on the team.

Vernon Wells- He won't cost you $136 million to draft so take a shot on him. He doesnt walk as much as you want, or slug consistently, but he will put up decent all around stats worth having.

Lind/Snyder- Don't draft quit yet, but be ready to pounce on the waiver wire as soon as the beginning of May.

Out!

The New York Yankees

In my sincerest opinion, the most over hyped team for the 2009 season is the New York Yankees. Sure, they acquired two of the top pitchers in the game and one of the best all around first basemen, but you have to look at the marginal differences between this year’s team and last year’s to determine if they really made any substantial upgrades. I point to this post that I made a few months back, in which I compared the value of the pieces the Yankees brought in against the pieces they let go. Nothing really substantial changed overall -- the Yankees of course HAD to bring players like Teixeira and CC in to replace the production of ex-Yankees like Mussina and Abreu.

Accordingly, the key pieces to the Yankees potential for success in 2009 will depend upon getting productive years from guys who were not productive in 2008. Defensively -- and I say this term lightly, as the defense of the Yankees outside of A-Rod and Teixeira is laughably poor -- this means the pitching staff's health does not force the Yankees to pitch Carl Pavano-type guys for a majority of their innings. This means a fully recovered Chien-Ming Wang, the groundballing third co-ace on the Yankee’s staff. This means that Phil Hughes, who has unfairly been getting AAAA labels thrown at him with only 100 or so major league innings to his name, can stay healthy and effective take over the role of the long game reliever/#6 guy/guy who will take Joba's place in the rotation when he gets moved back to the bullpen. It also means that Joba is not overextended by the Yankees (160 IP limit? Just follow the Verducci Rule).

Offensively, the Yankees are going to need a bounce back from Robinson Cano, whose entire season had luck conspire against him. We may not see a .340 average or 20 home runs from the guy again, but a .300 clip with a league-average .340 OBP and 15 home runs to boot is very possible -- and very necessary -- from this very average defender.

As I alluded to earleir, the big problem for the Yankees in 2009 is going to be defense (minus Mark Teixeira, A-Rod and Xavier Nady, provided they play him in either corner). The rest of the team is largely comprised of unathletic, offense compensating guys like Nick Swisher, Derek Jeter and Jorge Posada. While across 162 games, one can replaces poor defense with good offense, Baseball Prospectus has show than in small sample size situations against high caliber teams (aka the playoffs), defense is much more correlated to wins than offense. This means the statistical tides of fate are working against the Yankees, much like they do against the A’s, to make it past the early rounds of the playoffs -- that is, if they can even get there.
To sum this all in short, the Yankees have a great set of offensive players at their disposal, but a lot of offensive power is going to be canceled out by defensive inefficiency. Guys like Sabathia and Burnett, if healthy, are going to provide the Yankees with a lot of quality innings, but guys like Wang, who rely a lot more on routine defense to be effective, may be hurt. The Yankees may have spent almost half a billion dollars this off season, but thanks to players going their separate ways or retiring, a lot of that money was just spent to replace rather than improve and it’s going to be a steep uphill climb to compete with the Rays and Red Sox in 2009 -- no matter what ESPN thinks.


PLAYERS TO DRAFT:
o Derek Jeter
- As overrated as everyone may think Derek Jeter is, he might be the most underrated player going into the 2009 fantasy season. Sure, his defensive and offensive output have been on a rapid decline since 2006, but there is much to like about Jeter's 2009 value. A lot of Jeter's poor performance could be attributed to being drilled on the hand by Daniel Cabrera late May. Prior to that incident, Jeter was hitting a respectable .314. Furthermore, in the final two months, Jeter hit .344. AVG may be an incredibly overrated asset in the larger picture of how it contributes to a team's ability to win, but it is still a skill that is largely supported by a player's foot speed and ability to hit line drives. Jeter's career .360 BABIP is no fluke. Obviously, expecting a .360 BABIP from a 35 year old SS on the back end of his career is unreasonable, but
all but one projection system over on fangraphs thinks that a .345+ BABIP is very possible. As an obsessive mock drafter, I routinely see Jeter -- when not reached for by a moronic Yankee's fan who knows shit about baseball (let alone fantasy) in the second round -- go as late as rounds 12 and 13. Now that Jeter is hitting directly in front of a healthy A-Rod and newly minted Yankee Mark Teixeira, you should expect some serious rebound. 120 Rs, .300+ AVG and double digit HR/SBs (12/12 over/under?) totals are all realistic. Shortstop is a notoriously useless and overrated position outside the top tier (HanRam, Reyes) and Jeter's offensive potential, combined with his undervalued draft position, make him one of the most underrated players going into 2009. Simply put, if there's any gas left in the tank, 2009 will be one of the best opportunities for Jeter to capitalize upon it.
o Chien-Ming Wang - People just plan forget about Wang. I've seen him drafted as late as round 17 in mocks on ESPN and MockDraftCentral. If healthy, there is no reason he can't again get you 19 Ws, a sub 4 ERA and a decent WHIP. Just make sure you balance out his K-lessness somehow.
o Robinson Cano - He won't hit 25 HRs or .342, but his terrible 2008 campaign will make him an undervalued .300 hitting asset w/ 15+ HR power and a legit chance at racking up 85+ RBIs/Rs. Think of him as a heavily discounted Pedroia knock-off.
o Xavier Nady - The Mark DeRosa of the outfield (above average utility man turned quality starter). 25 HRs, a quality AVG and many RBIs very possible batting behind guys like A-Rod and Teixeira. Very underrated.
o A-Rod, Teixeira, Damon - No explanation necessary, expect more RBIs/Runs.

OVERRATED
o CC Sabatihia - Between tossing 513+ IP over the past two seasons, pitching five consecutive starts on three days rest LATE in the season, throwing 7 complete games in the final two months of the season and having been the second most abused pitcher -- his 111,844 Pitcher Abuse Point rating was 30% higher than the next most abused player -- in all of baseball last year, I'll let someone else waste their second and third round picks on CC. I don't care if he does have high W, high K, low ERA upside; it's just not worth the risk of seeing a top draft waste away for extended periods on the DL. Remember how ineffective CC was in the beginning of 2008, after having been only been the 26th most abused pitcher in 2007? Quick draft strategy: minimize the risk with your early draft picks and maximize it with your later ones.
o AJ Burnett - He's only healthy in contract years. Nuff said.
o Joba Chamberlain - The kid has great stuff, but his durability and longevity are a clear question. The Yankees view Joba as their future ace, so you shouldn't expect him to eclipse 160 IP during the regular season. Is two-thirds or three-fourths season really worth a top 10 pick?
o Mariano Rivera - Don't get me wrong; Mo Rivers has amazing stuff, but why overpay for closers (especially high brand name ones like Mo) when you can get a Bobby Jenks much later? How many more SV ops do you think Mo will get over, say, Matt Lindstrom? If anything, you should draft the closers from shitty teams because all of their wins will be save opportunities.

KEEP AN EYE ON...
o Phil Hughes - With only 106 IP to his major league name, Phil Hughes was a big loser in the Andy Pettite deal. Hughes has the stuff that dreams are made of -- his high K and low BB rates gave him a minor league FIP in the mid-2's. Injuries aside, Hughes just needs time to hone his stuff and adjust to the major league level. When that happens...well, you might just wish you picked him off waivers.

In Defense Of Steroids

First of all, steroids in baseball gets a bad rep. In football, it's only a four game suspension and no one really thinks anything of it. One of the greatest defensive players in the game right now, San Diego LB Shawn Merriman, was caught doing steroids. He took his suspension and no one really thought anything of it. It's almost worse for Merriman than for Bonds because Merriman plays a more physical position and he job specifically requires strength. So why is it abhorrent for baseball players to do steroids and not football players?

The reason is the culture of each sport. Football came out a long time ago and said doing steroids was a no-no. They came out at a reasonable time and told all football players early on about the negative affects of steroids, and knew it created an unfair competitive edge. Baseball didn't do that. They implicitly said it was acceptable to do steroids even though it is bad.

What people don't understand is this culture of baseball. EVERYONE in baseball is guilty of steroids being rampant in the sport. There was a code of silence in baseball, if you said something, you would be ostracized from the game you love so much. Roy Oswalt came out recently pissed that he had to play a player on 'roids but I didn't hear him say anything when he saw players using it. In fact, Oswalt played with Andy Pettitte and Roger Clemens and I didn't hear a peep from him then. I'm sure he and every single player in baseball knew of at least one person doing steroids or HGH and they didn't say a thing. I don't think people quite grasp the psychological and sociological impact there is in this situation. Think about this. You're a student in a giant math lecture hall. The professor is going over really fast some equation that you don't understand. Why don't you raise your hand to ask the professor to slow down and go over the equation so you can learn it. I mean, you're paying money for an education, you should get one right? Well, normally you don't because there's hundreds of other kids in the class who look down on you if you wasted THEIR time. There's sociological and psychological factors that make an environment that's not conducive for you to ask questions. Now the culture of baseball was not even close to the factors that go into you in a giant lecture hall.

If anyone outed a player, you personally then would have felt punishments. Outing a player was just something you could not do. ESPN is running a week long OTL special on steroids, and former A's trainer and conditioning coach (who played with Conseco and McGuire and many other 'roid users because the A's were a huge club to bring in steroids into baseball) said that he knew Conseco was doing steroids and he couldn't do anything and he didn't want to do anything. Not only would this coach never find a job again, but the A's would lose a huge asset to their team in Conseco.

(SIDENOTE: I just want to go off on a little tangent here. A few months ago, Jose Conseco said that Alex Rodriguez did steroids and nobody believed him. People thought this was a publicity stunt and Conseco got a lot of crap for this. It also looked extremely fishy when reports came out than Conseco blackmailed Magglio so that Mags would get his name out of Jose's new book. A-Rod has since admitted to doing steroids. It now makes you wonder about Magglio as well. Look who's laughing now)

The biggest offender to the culture of steroids in baseball was Bud Selig. One of the only defenders I've heard of him was Skip Bayless, and Skip makes a valid point. Skip talked to Selig during the late 90's when 'roids was rampant and Selig admitted that he was up against one of THE most powerful unions in the U.S. in the Players Association. The Association knew testing for steroids would hurt their clients and thus did everything in their power to stop Selig from being able to do anything about testing for steroids or HGH in baseball. I think this is a good point. However, I refuse to believe, that as the commissioner of ALL of Major League Baseball, he could not do a single thing. Selig didn't speak up, Selig didn't make public his dislike for steroids, Selig didn't publicly try to enforce testing, Selig didn't do shit. And this contributed to players being "allowed" to do steroids.

If you're a player and you see teammates all around you doing steroids, nobody is saying anything, these players doing great things, and having no negative consequences, what's the downside then to you for doing steroids? No one would have predicted the negative backlash steroids would have caused ten years down the line. I'm sure if Mark McGuire knew he wouldn't get into the baseball Hall Of Fame if he did steroids, he would have not done them. But nobody knew back them. People need to remember that what these players were doing was not against the rules of baseball. Sure, what they were doing was against US law, but this becomes a negligent factor in terms of the way players played the game. From a rational, economic, sociological, and psychological perspective, baseball players had no reason to NOT do steroids.

The vast majority of players who did steroids were not the big players like Bonds, A Rod, and McGuire, they were guys on the cusp on making major league rosters. It is extremely hard to get into the big leagues from the minors. If you're in the minors and you see your teammates around you getting called up, why would you not do steroids? This environment is almost forcing you to do steroids.

Injecting steroids or HGH alone does not magically make a person better or stronger. A player still has to work out and condition himself to play baseball. They still have to have the skill to see the ball coming towards the play and have the hand/eye coordination to hit the ball. These are all things steroids don't improve. However, once a player makes contact, sure, 'roids make that ball go deeper and farther. As my roommate puts it "You know, Barry Bonds may not have hit 72 HRs that year, but he still probably would have hit 50 had he not been on steroids" Also, while some batters might have been juicing, you don't know is that pitcher was juicing as well. Again, steroids doesn't help with control but sure it does help with speed. Maybe those pitchers were trying to get themselves a competitive advantage as well so the batters were forced to do HGH or 'roids.

Also, I would like to interject something. People seem to give Andy Pettitte a free pass because he fully admitted early on that he used steroids and that it was only for an injury. However, one of the reasons steroids was made illegal was for the purpose of healing from injuries and not just from constant use to build power. You're not allowed to help speed up the process of injuries because this also gives you an unfair advantage compared to everyone else that had to deal with injuries without steroids.

Steroids was so rampant in baseball that you can not say for 100% certainty who was and was not using steroids. You don't exactly know which players were using or if most of them were. This means you can not say just how "skewed" the stats are. Let's say Roger Clemens was facing Barry Bonds and Bonds hits a home run. Is not that a legitimate HR for the record books? If both the pitcher and the batter using performance-enhancing drugs, if the ultimate outcome not the same as if both players did not use the drugs? This is why I don't think players who we know did use steroids should get penalized in the record books or in the hall of fame. You can not say for certain what exactly the competitive edge actually was.

In fact, throughout history, there's always been things that have skewed numbers. The dead ball era most certainly deflated stats and hurt players like Ty Cobb. Way back in the day, black people were not allowed to play baseball. You don't think the addition of black people would have decreased the current white players numbers? The pitching mounds have been moved back and forth and up and down, all which affect players numbers as well.

People also don't realize that steroids saved baseball. In the summer of 1998, Mark McGuire and Sammy Sosa (who actually BTW seemingly is getting farther and farther away from being connected to steroids) were both in the hunt to beat Roger Marris' record of 61 HRs in a single season. Baseball was lackluster and boring until these two competitors from rival teams starting facing off against each other. Because both were "on steroids", they were able to bring fans back into the game of baseball.

Now don't get me wrong, despite the title and my whole speech, I am not advocating that people do use steroids or HGH or anything of the sort. Steroids have a lot of negative consequences to the human body, especially to young kids who probably are the biggest age bracket to use steroids. It stunts development and creates physical problems. I am also not letting these players completely off the hook. Despite the fact that probably a vast majority of people did juice, there are plenty who didn't. People still have take personal responsibility for their own actions. A lot of what the Nazi's did in Germany was because if the culture Hitler created and psychological tests (like the Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgrim Experiment)back this up, however, you can't put all of the blame on the culture. (NOTE: I am not comparing baseball to Nazi Germany, I am just using that as an example of where culture dictates human behavior)

I believe the blame does start at the top. Bud Selig and the owners and the Player Union and such all had the power to put a stigma in the culture with little repercussions to themselves and culture is trickle down. But all players need to take responsibility for their actions as well. They knew full well what they were doing was giving themselves a competitive edge.

So I think people need to stop putting such a negative stigma on the players who did steroids before 2003. Sure, if a player now does steroids, that players deserves all the criticism he gets. But ESPN needs to stop the hype and falsities of players who did steroids and HGH in the past. I think people think so low of players who juiced in the past because of the messages outlets like ESPN are displaying and this needs to stop. Also, I'm sick and tired of hearing about this 24/7.

Eastbound And Down

Warning, the following video is NSFW!



What if I told you there's a new TV show out there executive produced by Will Ferrell (Semi-Pro, Blades of Glory, Talladega Nights, Kicking and Screaming) and Adam McKay (Anchorman, Stepbrothers, Talladega Nights) and stars Danny McBride (Tropic Thunder, Pineapple Express) as Kenny Powers, an old washed up ex-baseball pitcher. Interested?

I couldn't find the pilot but here's the second episode. Sorry it's so big (that's what she said)

Also, I realize Will Ferrell was in much funnier movies but seeing as this is a sports blog, I decided to only display his sports movies

The Boston Red Sox

The Red Sox, unlike the Yankees, made qualified upgrades to their team during the offseason. After trading out the temperamental Manny Ramirez for Jason Bay in 2008, their team has only got better. While you can easily argue that Manny is one of the top hitters in the game, his defense is substantially subpar. While Manny had a “great defensive year” in 2008, only being 3 runs below average defensively speaking, his career average is something in line with -20 or more runs, or -2 wins. Jason Bay on the other hand, despite being on a defensive ability decline (from being worth positive runs to negative runs in the last few years), isn’t projected to cost his team much more than a run defensively next season (especially at less than spacious Fenway). When you combine this with a strong, but slightly inferior, offensive skill set (Jason Bay is a .900+ OPS guy, compared to Manny’s 1.000 OPS abilities), you do not get much of a loss in overall contribution value in swapping Manny for Bay -- especially when you factor in that you never know which Manny Ramirez is going to play for you day by day.

The Red Sox spent much of the offseason investing in low-risk, high reward acquisitions like John Smoltz, Takashi Saito, Brad Penny and Rocco Baldelli. These players aren’t getting paid a whole lot but have enough upside, when healthy, to make huge contributions to their teams. For an example of this upside, we look at John Smoltz, who has been one of the best pitchers in baseball over the past two decades. Smoltz is projected to make his debut with the Red Sox sometime around July. If healthy, this would give the Red Sox a powerful, fresh arm down the final stretch of what is surely to be the most competitive divisional race in all of baseball. Rocco Baldelli, if healthy, would easily be one of the game’s best 4th outfielders. Brad Penny…well, no one really expects much from Brad Penny, whose entire career has been propped up by luck and strong first half starts that mask his late season collapses. Anything he does better than Tim Wakefield will be pure gravy. Then, of course, there is the always dominant ex-closer Saito, a non-tender from the Dodgers this year due to injury concerns. These guys, if healthy, will be very important come September.

Let’s not, however, forget the “those other guys” on the team, the prospects we have yet to see get in on the action full time. Clay Buchholz still has sick stuff and will surely get a chance to prove himself this year, if for no other reason to be traded to the Rangers mid-season for a catcher. There is also uber prospect Michael Bowden looming and dominating in AAA; expect to see him make an extended stint in the big show this year.

Oh yeah, there’s also reining MVP Dustin Pedroia, who, despite being incredibly overrated, is still valuable defensively (and offensively, provided he continues to smack line drives above a 20% clip). There is also the now-healthy (or so Theo Epstein claims) David Ortiz, who is just a fucking monster. Don’t expect the 40+ home run days of yore from him, but 30+ is still very reasonable. If Mike Lowell can’t stay healthy, Kevin Youkilis may have to slide back to third to make room for a guy like Lars Anderson -- the Red Sox’s #1 ranked prospect (who can’t be any worse than Lowell was in his limited plate appearances last year) -- to play first. I’m not a fan of JD Drew (injured, inconstant), but 25 year old Jacoby Ellsbury has show much defensive prowess in center and above average offensive skills at the plate and on the base paths that will only develop further as he enters his prime years.

All in all, you have to say the Red Sox not only have a great line up, but some great depth to protect the team against injury (especially in terms of pitching). I do not think, however, that the Red Sox have upgraded their 2009 team by a large enough margin to match or surpass the Rays offseason additions (and thus, I expect The Red Sox to be at least as “inferior” to the Rays in 2009 as they were in 2008 -- notice that word in quotes). On the other hand, I do think the Sox have increased their team by a better margin than the Bronx Bombers and see them as the team to beat for the AL Wildcard in 2009.

PLAYERS TO DRAFT:
o Jason Bay
- The green monster may turn some of his HRs into doubles, but expect big RBI totals from the man who replaced ManRam now that he's out of Pittsburgh; 30 HRs, 110 RBI, 100 R, 900 OPS all possible.
o David Ortiz - Coming off a season plagued with injuries, the question is will Papi be healthy in 2009? If so, he could easily rack up 35 HRs, 110 RBI, 100 Rs and a .285 average at a discounted price.
o Jacoby Ellsbury - In one word, underrated. Ellsbury is 3 category guy who can rack up steals without hurting your team somehow. 30+ SB, .290+ AVG, 100 R, 10 HR all possible.
o Josh Beckett, Jonathan Papelbon - Nothing that is not already known needs to be said about these guys.

OVERRATED GUYS:
o JD Drew
- Inconsistent in production and health. Not worth the risk (or headache).
o John Lester- Great PR story (guy battles cancer, comes back to throw a no-no), but most of his 2008 numbers were based on luck. 4.13 career FIP and 78% LOB last year indicate impending regression. 4+ ERA, 88 BB, 160 K, 1.4 WHIP more likely than last year's 3.21/66/152/1.27 line.
o Dice-K - His 2.9 ERA and 128 hits in 168 IP were nice, but 5.05 BB/9 and 4.03 FIP are not. Expect some serious regression from Dice-K as those control issues come back to bite him big time this year. Definately not worth a top 10 pick, even for the Ks.
o Dustin Pedroia - Something about an MVP who can't hit 20 HRs in unsatisfying. While undeniably useful as 5 category 2B last year, his increasing GB/FB ratio and declining BB% are worrisome. With a strong LD% and speed, his high AVG should persist, but don't expect anything above 15 HRs. Considering that all but a few second basemen are second tier, it's not worth wasting a third round pick on a 2B (unless you get Kinlser or Utley at a ridiculous discount) when you can have the negligibly worse Mark DeRosa 12 rounds later.
o Kevin Youkilis - Anyone who reads this blog by now should know how overrated I think The Greek God Of Walks is. For a length explanation of why, you can checkout my comments in this post. Otherwise, let's just leave it at the fact that 2009 was a career fluke for the guy who never before posted more than 18 HRs or a +.170 ISO in a season at ANY level.

GUYS TO KEEP AN EYE ON:
o John Smoltz
- When healthy, he's downright filthy. Should make his debut after the All-Star break.

30 Teams In 30 Days: A Baseball Preview

As some of you readers might have already guessed, the authors of Game Of Inches will be previewing a different baseball team every day for all 30 days of March. Since all four of us are avid baseball fans (and experts of course), we will be treating all 10 ten of you loyal readers will our insight of a different baseball team everyday. As you might have guessed, we are starting with the AL East. Each division will be done by a different author. Up next will be the AL Central then the AL West, then of course we will move on to the NL. There will be 28 more team to come within the next 28 days of March; so enjoy!

SIDENOTE: Cubsfan4evr sent out an email wanting to type this post. So sorry Cubsfan for stealing your thunder. But frankly, I have no idea why you sent out an email instead of just taking the initiative upon yourself.... but anyways. You said this needed to be done, so here it is!

The Cubs in the World Baseball Classic

The World Baseball Classic starts March 5th. The Chicago Cubs have four players on the 25 man roster in the World Baseball Classic. They are Ted Lilly (USA), Carlos Marmol (Dominican Republic), Kosuke Fukudome (Japan), and Geovany Soto (Puerto Rico). They also have minor league prospects Alex Maestri (Italy) and Vince Perkins (Canada) playing in the World Baseball Classic.

Carlos Marmol was not going to play in the World Baseball Classic, but decided the other day he wanted to. This was after Lou reassured him that he would not loose the closer’s job if he went. He will compete against Kevin Gregg for the closer’s job when he gets back from the World Baseball Classic now. I think Kosuke Fukudome playing in the World Baseball Classic is a good thing. Hopefully playing with his fellow country men in a comfortable environment will get him starting off on the right foot. Then hopefully this will carry over into the season.

I think the World Baseball Classic is a great place for prospects to play and showcase what they can do. This is a good thing for Alex Maestri playing for Italy and Vince Perkins of Canada. Both should get good playing time and help their development.

Lets hope team USA does better than they did in the inaugural World Baseball Classic.

Dusty’s Reds changing approach

Dusty Baker has always been known for playing the veterans and being a fan of the long ball. According to this article http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/story/11439492 Dusty Baker and the Cincinnati Reds actually want to run this year. This is shocking to hear about any Dusty Baker team. The article points out how they brought in Willy Tavaras who loves to run and steals a lot of basses.

Dusty said that "We've had eight years of losing the other way," Baker said. "It's time to do something different, don't you think?"

Adding one player who runs doesn’t mean you’re a running team all of a sudden. They still have Votto and Bruce who are power guys. Phillips is a guy who will steal some bases. Both candidates at shortstop don’t really run and Gonzalez will probably get the job being a veteran over the less experience Keppinger. Encaration doesn’t do anything and Ramon Hernandez doesn’t run. That leaves left field where a few players are competing for the left field. They are: Jerry Hairston Jr. (A dusty favorite from Chicago), Chris Dickerson who I think should be the starting left fielder, but he is a rookie playing for Dusty baker, so good luck to him. Some other guys brought competing are Jonny Gomes, Jacque Jones, Norris Hopper, Daryle Ward and Laynce Nix. Some of those guys have speed like Hariston and Hopper, but Hariston doesn’t run a lot. Thus, no matter who wins the left field job, they only have two starters who can actually run. Only one more than last year! Sounds like a big change Dusty!

The Baltimore Orioles

We already know I Baltimore is generally a graveyard for washed up Cubs, but what does that say for '09? While no one expects the Orioles to be able to compete, no matter how good they are minus some act of god in 2009, they’ve seemingly built a good young team with much future potential. Guys with high ceilings likes Felix Pie -- who has under 500 major league at bats to his name -- are still developing and with the right kind of seasoning, could develop to be top players by 2011. Aside from veteran force Brian Roberts, who was recently signed to a four year deal, the team is going young. They’ve cut ties with players like Kevin Millar and Daniel Cabrera and aside from a half-hearted run at Mark Teixeira, the O’s have shown little indication of pursuing any high profile veterans any time soon. They’ve traded out several pieces like Kevin Olson for younger talent and added low-risk, high reward pitcher Rich Hill, who, despite being out of options, will probably get a full season at the major league level to fix his mechanical problems if for no other reason than the O’s have nobody better to slot into their rotation. What amounts here, with the likes of Luke Scott, Adam Jones and catching prospect Matt Wieters, is a team with the potential to contend in the future. Unfortunately, however, the O’s play in the AL East and will always be financial outnumbered by the Red Sox and Yankees, who have recently moved towards smarter spending tendencies. This, combined with the ultra deep farm system of the Tampa Bay Rays projects a bleak future for the future contending potential of the Orioles.

Guys to draft in 2009:
o Matt Wieters - I wouldn’t overdraft him, as I wouldn’t expect to see Wieters join the O’s roster prior to mid-May (to delay arbitration and avoid super-two status), but he’s certainly someone who will be very productive (offensively speaking) for fantasy owners who save a spot for him on their bench. Wieters, a top pick for the O’s in 2006 (a great year for talent), has mashed up minor league pitching over the past two seasons and projects to be a plus batting average, plus home run power catcher. Think a young Jorge Posada.

Guys to keep on your radar in 2009:
o Felix Pie - Despite being labeled a “wash up” like his 5 tools predecessor Corey Patterson, Pie has yet to accumulate over 500 at bats to his name at the major league level. Most of this playing time has been split between various trips to the majors between 2007 and 2008. The frustrated Cubs gave up on Pie without giving him a fair chance, which bodes well for the O’s (who bought low on his services) provided his potential materializes. Pie, however, is less of a fantasy commodity than he is one to his real team, as his defensive prowess and speed hasn’t translated into stolen bases at any level of play. His high K rate also doesn’t lend well to maintaining a useful batting average. He does, on the other hand, flash 15 plus home run power.

o Rich Hill - Another “washed up” Cub, Hill still has his great stuff. His strikeout rate last year remained high in the minors and majors; he just lost control over that knee buckling curveball. If he can just shave his BB/9 down to league average, he looks to be a positive fantasy commodity in ‘09. I wouldn’t draft him, but I’d surely place a waiver out for him at the first sign of sustained success.

Overrated Players for 2009:
Luke Scott - With the addition of Felix Pie, Scott is going to get bumped to the DH role for the immediate future. From a fantasy perspective, Luke Scott is not a very appealing player. While he does possess respectable plate discipline (11.3 BB% career) and a strong career ISO (.231), he is not surrounded by many high on base guys to drive in (low RBI's) or many power guys to drive him in (low R's). Furthermore, Scott's 22% K rate puts him in below average BA territory (expect something around .270 or lower, to the tune of what one would expect from Aaron Rowand, Akinori Iwamura or Jhonny Peralta). Furthermore, Scott's above average defensive range in the OF doesn't translate into stolen bases (8 SB and 5 CS in 1300 career PAs). So unless your league rewards BB (not OBP) and XBH's/TB's, Scott isn't exactly anyone to salivate over. However, in the broader perspective of things, Scott should be very valuable (offensively) for the Orioles in 2009 and beyond.

Why is Hamilton playing Center?

I just read that Josh Hamilton got injured in yesterday’s game. The thing that stood out to me in the article was that he is playing center field? I want to know why. Josh Hamilton can play center, but he is not great. The Rangers have many alternatives that are better in center such as Andrew Jones, Marlon Bryd, and David Murphy. Hamilton is their best hitting outfielder, so why not put him in one of the corner’s to preserve him more for his offense when one of the other corner guys are more than capable to play center.

Wood Bothered by back Stiffness

Kerry Wood has not pitched in a spring training game yet for the Indians because he has had back stiffness. He threw a bullpen session the other day and should start playing in games soon. I am glad the Cubs let Kerry Wood walk for 10 million a year! I like Kerry Wood and think he is a good pitcher when healthy, but his health is a big problem. He is never healthy and not dependable. Yes, most of his injuries aren’t season ending, but you can’t depend on him as your closer. He is sometimes not an option for days at a time with these little nagging injuries. I wish Kerry Wood all the best, but after hearing about his back stiffness I am so glad we didn’t continue the Kerry Wood saga in Chicago.

Hoffman Classy guy

Trevor Hoffman spent 16 years with the San Diego Padres. At 41 years old they didn’t want to bring him back so he signed with the Brewers. He wanted to end his career with the same team which he spent his whole career with and loved the city. To show his gratitude he decided to take out a full page ad in the San Diego Union-Tribune. He is one if the few classy ball players left in the game. Kerry Wood also took out an ad in the paper thanking Cubs fans when he left, but it doesn’t come with the same warmth Hoffman’s did. Hoffman’s looked like a holiday card with a picture of his family, not just photos of his playing days. To see what I mean and check out the ad see the full story here: http://www.nbcsandiego.com/sports/baseball/padres/Hoffy-Says-See-ya-in-Full-Page-Ad-.html

Chicago Cubs non-roster Invitees

The Chicago Cubs have invited twenty one non roster invitees to spring training this spring. This is a variety of players from the Cubs minor leagues who they wanted to give a taste of spring training, journey guys, and veteran’s. These players are invited to camp and competing for a job on the big league roster, but re not on the 40 man roster. Thus, in order for them to make the team, a roster spot would have to be cleared for them by trading or releasing someone currently on the 40 man roster. Out of the 21 players they invited there are eleven pitchers, three catchers, four infielders and three outfielders. The eleven pitchers are: Edward Campusano, Esmailin Caridad, Andrew Cashner, Chad Fox, Ken Kadokura, J.R. Mathes, Rocky Roquet, Matt Smith, Mike Stanton, Jason Waddell, and Bill White. The three catchers are: Welington Castillo, Steve Clevenger, and Mark Johnson. The four infielders are: Darwin Barney, Andres Blanco, Luis Rivas, and Bobby Scales. The three outfielders are: Doug Deeds, Jason Dubois, and So Taguchi.

Andrew Cashner was the Cubs first round pick last year. He was a closer in College and the Cubs hope good things from his soon. That was their intent when they drafted a closer with their top pick. He could be a part of the bullpen this year if someone gets injured. If he had a better year last season in the minor’s, he could have joined the bullpen this year. Instead of going with the old notion of drafting a starter and developing him, their hoping a closer can help the team now. Chad Fox is hoping for his third stint with the Cubs. He has been injury proned his whole career and both of his last Cubs stint’s have been very short because of injury’s which has taken him over a year to recovery each time. Ken Kadokura is a Japense pitcher who never played in the major’s. He was cut last year by his team in Japan and did not pitch. He is older so his best days are behind him, but he has been a swingman throughout most of his career in Japan. One of the reasons’s for bringing him in is that he played for a year on the same team with Fukudome and that maybe someone of the same culture would make thing’s easier on him. Mike Stanton is a 41 year old lefty reliever who did not pitch at all last year. He used to be a good left reliever, but is getting up their and not as good as he used to be. If Sean Marshall does start that would only leave Neal Cotts in the bullpen, so they could use a second lefty then. Those are the non roster invitee pitcher’s who have the best chance of making the team. The other guys would even be more of a long shot at making the club than these guys.

The Cubs have no position player’s in camp that I think will make the team out of spring training. There are a few that could be called up during the season depending on the injury and how their performing at that time. So Taguchi has played for over seven years in the major’s as a back up outfielder. He can play all three outfield spots if needed, but left is his best defensive position. He owns a career 279 average. He does not have much power with 19 homers over the seven seasons and is a solid fundamental player, but does nothing exceptional. An example is Joey Gathright who is one of the Cubs back outfielders. Gathright has great speed which gives him the edge to complement our roster. Corey Koskie was just signed the other day. He has not played in a few years after injuries. Before his injury he was a average everyday third basemen. If he gets back to his old firm, which is a big if, he would give us a good backup for Ramirez when he gets injured. He would need to practice at another position to give us some flexibility though. The Cubs also have Luis Rivas who is a great glove man, but has not bat. If there is injury to one of our infielder’s he would probably get the call up. Mark Johnson has some major league experience, but with Hill in front of him, and Bako and Soto as the Cubs catcher’s, he seems to be the odd man out. Jason Dubois has the same power he had several year ago, but needs to show he can put it together at the major league level which looks doubtful.

Let’s see how all of the non roster invitees look in spring training!

The Matt Cassel Trade

Yesterday, the Chiefs new GM, former Patriots VP, traded away their 2009 2nd round, 34th overall draft pick. What did they get in return, QB Matt Cassell and LB Mike Vrabel.

The Chiefs side:
A great benefit of going 2-14 is that you get an amazing draft position. The Chiefs 2nd pick is extremely valuable because that draftee is going to be a high quality player and there's no reason to think this said player can't compete at a high level for many years to come. The Chiefs are a young team and this draft pick would fit right in with the team. Instead, now the Chiefs get a young QB whom I'm not convinced will play at a high level consistently like he did late year and a 12 year LB on the decline.

Matt Cassel: This kid was great last year. He really was on of the top ten QBs of 2008. But the thing was, he played for the New England Patriots. He had Randy Moss and Wes Welker has receivers and had just a fantastic offensive line. Plenty of time and great receivers make any QB look better than they actually are. Now Cassel moves to Kansas City where his receivers are Mark Bradley (former Bear BTW) and Dwayne Bowe. Don't get me wrong, their fine receivers, but they're nowhere close to the level of Moss and Welker. Cassel will now also see a decrease in the amount of time he has to throw the ball which will decrease his production. And here's the thing, the Chiefs have a fine young QB they can develop in Tyler Thigpen. This kid improved throughout the year and if used correctly, would have had better numbers in 2008. Just watching Thigpen, you can see KC had a QB for the future

Mike Vrabel: Don't get me wrong, I love Vrabel. As a Pats fan, I love what he's done for the organization. I just don't see him helping out the Chiefs all that much. It seems he's much better suited for New England than he is in Kansas City. Plus he's OLD. At least with Cassel there's theoretical upside, with Vrabel I just don't see this 12 year vet doing a whole lot

The Patriots side: I think the Patriots got the better end out of this deal. Yes, they give up a key guy in Mike Vrabel, but as I said before, he's old. And if the Pats are willing to part with him, I just don't see him doing a whole lot now. And the Pats didn't need Cassel at all. Next season they'll have Tom Brady, the best(or second best depending on who you talk to) QB in the NFL right now. If he's healthy, he'll be a stud and no reason to have Cassel on the roster. Now I think it was really stupid to franchise Cassel because it ate up cap room, but I guess the Pats were planning on trading him. And they did. Now if Brady does get injured again, then the Pats now lose that valuable back up. But the Patriots system is so good, I'm sure which ever QB the Pats sign as their back up (how funny would that be if that guy was Rex Grossman!), that player will be just as effective as Cassell was- at cheaper too.

Plus the Patriots get a great draft pick in return. As I mentioned earlier, that 34th pick overall is very high and the Pats can now get a young stud of their choosing in return.

Winner: New England Patriots. The Pats gave up a QB they didn't need, a LB who probably won't be THAT effective and gained ton of cap room to sign players they did need (like Vince Wilfork) and gained a young player that will be extremely effective because the Pats know how to draft well. Meanwhile, the Chiefs gained a QB who probably won't produce that the organization would want him to, a LB that won't be THAT effective, and lost a ton of cap room and the chance to pick a great young player.